<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: building with layers and pngs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.eleven3.com/video/building-with-layers-and-pngs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.eleven3.com/video/building-with-layers-and-pngs/</link>
	<description>Portland Web Design, Web Development, George Huff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 19:04:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://www.eleven3.com/video/building-with-layers-and-pngs/comment-page-1/#comment-183</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 17:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eleven3.com/?p=71#comment-183</guid>
		<description>Would this be the &quot;Steve James IE Validation Hack?&quot;

Don&#039;t you think you can completely avoid IE Hacks (except for PNG&#039;s) with any layout?

Ever since going through the Nicholas Galanin experience, I think it&#039;s possible.

And what about the outline: none tag?  I hate those outlines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would this be the &#8220;Steve James IE Validation Hack?&#8221;</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t you think you can completely avoid IE Hacks (except for PNG&#8217;s) with any layout?</p>
<p>Ever since going through the Nicholas Galanin experience, I think it&#8217;s possible.</p>
<p>And what about the outline: none tag?  I hate those outlines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve James</title>
		<link>http://www.eleven3.com/video/building-with-layers-and-pngs/comment-page-1/#comment-182</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 15:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eleven3.com/?p=71#comment-182</guid>
		<description>Ah, but your CSS can and will validate if you use a Javascript  technique I came up with!

Go to  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.utahtechspotlight.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.utahtechspotlight.com&lt;/a&gt; for a reference on how I get my CSS to validate with non-compliant code. I basically include an external JavaScript file, in this case called &quot;javascript_mozilla_hacks.js&quot;. In the JavaScript I basically determine if the user has a Mozilla browser, if so then I include a special stylesheet, via JavaScript, with invalid CSS - this example just gets rid of active marques on A tags. I execute all the hacky, invalid code I want in this stylesheet.

Since the code is ran through JavaScript, validaters and such do not check these hacky &quot;on-demand&quot; stylesheets, and your page will validate!

Is this an absolute solution? Not, really. However, why sacrifice a good design for validation purposes. Fool the validators until CSS3 comes around!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, but your CSS can and will validate if you use a Javascript  technique I came up with!</p>
<p>Go to  <a href="http://www.utahtechspotlight.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.utahtechspotlight.com</a> for a reference on how I get my CSS to validate with non-compliant code. I basically include an external JavaScript file, in this case called &#8220;javascript_mozilla_hacks.js&#8221;. In the JavaScript I basically determine if the user has a Mozilla browser, if so then I include a special stylesheet, via JavaScript, with invalid CSS &#8211; this example just gets rid of active marques on A tags. I execute all the hacky, invalid code I want in this stylesheet.</p>
<p>Since the code is ran through JavaScript, validaters and such do not check these hacky &#8220;on-demand&#8221; stylesheets, and your page will validate!</p>
<p>Is this an absolute solution? Not, really. However, why sacrifice a good design for validation purposes. Fool the validators until CSS3 comes around!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

